Pension is Not a Bounty III


Justice S. Talapatra along with Chief Justice T. Vaiphei, as Judges of High Court of Tripura on 31.10.2017, struck down Rule 3(3) of The Tripura State Civil Services (Revised Pension) Rules, 2009. At present, Justice S. Talapatra is Judge No. 3 at High Court of Orissa.  

_____

When specific statistics were provided before High Court, there was no reason for High Court to doubt same. Whether financial crunch/financial constraint can be a valid ground to fix a cut­-off date for purpose of granting actual benefit of revision of pension/pay has been dealt with and/or considered by this Court in State of Punjab v. Amar Nath Goyal, (2005) 6 SCC 754. It was specifically observed, for grant of additional benefit, which had financial implications, prescription of a specific future date for conferment of additional benefit, could not be considered arbitrary. State of Bihar v. Bihar Pensioners Samaj, (2006) 5 SCC 65 followed Amar Nath Goyal. It was further observed, fixing of a cut-­off date for granting of benefits is well within powers of Government as long as reasons are not arbitrary and are based on some rational consideration. High Court manifestly erred in striking down Rule 3(3) of The Tripura State Civil Services (Revised Pension) Rules, 2009.

Hon’ble Justice M.R. Shah, State of Tripura v. Smt. Anjana Bhattacharjee, [Civil Appeal No. 5114 of 2022].



Source link

Comments are closed.