Browsing Category
Law \ Legal
The Revival of Ray XC
Constitution Bench in Sukhdev Singh v. Bhagatram Sardar Singh Raghuvanshi, (1975) 1 SCC 421 held, the words ‘rules’ and ‘regulations’ are used in an Act to limit powers of a statutory…
Read More...
Read More...
Quia Timet III
Learned Counsel for Appellant-Defendant states, Learned Single Judge has erred in not considering: Respondent-Plaintiff had bypassed Section 12A of The Commercial Court Act, 2015,…
Read More...
Read More...
Referred to Larger Bench XVII Answered: Illegal Gratification I
“The question, ‘whether in absence of evidence of complainant / direct or primary evidence of demand of illegal gratification, is it not permissible to draw inferential deduction…
Read More...
Read More...
Referred to Larger Bench XXXIII: K. Meghachandra, (2020) 5 SCC 689
With greatest respect to Hon’ble Bench which dealt with K. Meghachandra Singh v. Ningam Siro, 2020 5 SCC 689, we find, attention was not invited to binding decisions of…
Read More...
Read More...
Quia Timet II / The Drastic Power of Rejecting a Plaint VII
My Lord, Allegations in Plaint are Sufficient?
No.
In assessing whether a quia timet plaint can be rejected outright , Teva Pharmaceutical Industries v. Natco Pharma…
Read More...
Read More...
Product Configuration Trade Dress | The Last Word
Plaintiffs are manufacturers of containers, used to store food products, sold under the brand name ’Tupperware’. Defendant is also a manufacturer of containers, used for storage…
Read More...
Read More...
Section 319 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 II
The power of Court under Section 319 has been reiterated in Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab, (2014) 3 SCC 92. It has been held, such power is available before pronouncement of…
Read More...
Read More...
Honourable Acquittal V
Pramod applied for the post of a Police Constable. He disclosed, he had been tried for an offence under Section 498A, IPC. As he was involved in a criminal case earlier, though…
Read More...
Read More...
Consent, March 2007 | The Last Word
Omkar is a teacher in a Government school. Vimala was a student reading in said school. Vimala alleged, Omkar had sexual intercourse with her on putting her to fear, she would be…
Read More...
Read More...
Dhola Maaru v. Dhola Tharu
Pfizer Products Inc. v. Rajesh Chopra, 2006 SCC OnLine Del observed, threat of selling offending goods in Delhi would itself confer jurisdiction to Courts in Delhi to entertain a…
Read More...
Read More...